JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 22, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Director De La Escuela Penitenciaria Nacional

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitudes De Aclaracion De La Sentencia T-1266 De 2008. La Sala Resolvio Negar La Solicitud De La Referencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Formulación oportuna dentro de los tres días siguientes a la notificación
  • Procedencia de oficio y a solicitud de parte respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
Fallo De Revision De Tutela
  • Reiteración improcedencia de aclaración, corrección o adición
Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar por extemporánea, falta de legitimación y no referir ni el objeto y contenido del fallo en sentencia T-1266/08
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Denegar la solicitud de aclaracion de la sentencia T-1266 de 2008 presentada por el Director de la Escuela Nacional Penitenciaria.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR al Director de la Escuela Nacional Penitenciaria que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.